He was right about this. The Stones didn't have to follow the Beatles into the putrid psychedelic era. Pretentious, soulless, lacking in balls...what else?
There's a lot of rubbish on Satanic Majesties. Just too much time on our hands, too many drugs, no producer to tell us, "Enough already, thank you very much, now can we just get on with this song?" Anyone let loose in the studio will produce stuff like that. There was simply too much hanging around. It's like believing everything you do is great and not having any editing.
Gimme "Exile on Main St." anytime.
Btw, Mick Jagger "trying to sound black or something" did not start with "Exile".
You must have missed their first albums. The early Stones were ALL about black R&B, blues, soul, etc.
I never considered Hendrix or the Doors psychedelic.
Well more so than any other band, the Jimi Hendrix Experience defined psychedelic rock in 1967. And the Doors were close behind. So you like some psychedelic music. Live with it.
We have completely opposite tastes.... The White Album completely made up for it. THAT was brilliant.
Following the album's release, the Rolling Stones abandoned their psychedelic style for a stripped-down return to their roots in blues music.
The Beatles early sound was just too "girly" for me. Google "self indulgent" and you get pictures of the "Satanic Majesty's" and "Sgt. Peppers" lp covers.
You just prefer lightweight music. Who wouldn't love "Helter Skelter", Happiness is a Warm Gun", "Back in the U.S.S.R.", etc.?
So stripped down blues after Their Satanic Majesties Request my ass! I want to strangle the dilettantes and merely casual Stones' fans who parrot this preposterous lie. I'd love to see a stripped down Stones band in concert these days, but methinks all my hope's in vain.
You are simply insane.
Btw, what is your hang up with horns? Were you abused by a tuba as a child.
You never mention anything past the sixties.
How about Bowie (caution, some horn use), Lou Reed, Clash, Sex Pistols.
en iyi bahis siteleri
https://diziizle.wtf/
totobo